<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The One Site to Rule Them All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notorious-rob.com/2009/02/17/the-one-site-to-rule-them-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notorious-rob.com/2009/02/17/the-one-site-to-rule-them-all/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
	<description>On Marketing, Technology, and Real Estate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:04:31 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ines</title>
		<link>http://www.notorious-rob.com/2009/02/17/the-one-site-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1232</link>
		<dc:creator>ines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 23:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notorious-rob.com/?p=696#comment-1232</guid>
		<description>I used to have several websites, a blog and finally blended them all together into a hybrid blog-site with some static info and the basic structure of a blog.  It has made my life so much easier, has helped me strengthen our brand and released some stress.

While defining my audience though, I have realized that 2 sites will benefit our business and I am working on a second one as we speak - miamism always being our hub and the other one just for the audience and business that the particular readership brings.

I don&#039;t think there&#039;s a right and wrong way - we each need to define our goals and identify aspects of our business that will benefit from the different structures.  And yes....i will continue with the mojito vids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to have several websites, a blog and finally blended them all together into a hybrid blog-site with some static info and the basic structure of a blog.  It has made my life so much easier, has helped me strengthen our brand and released some stress.</p>
<p>While defining my audience though, I have realized that 2 sites will benefit our business and I am working on a second one as we speak &#8211; miamism always being our hub and the other one just for the audience and business that the particular readership brings.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a right and wrong way &#8211; we each need to define our goals and identify aspects of our business that will benefit from the different structures.  And yes&#8230;.i will continue with the mojito vids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim White</title>
		<link>http://www.notorious-rob.com/2009/02/17/the-one-site-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-968</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 01:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notorious-rob.com/?p=696#comment-968</guid>
		<description>Google renders this discussion moot.  It&#039;s not about the website, or whether it&#039;s integrated with a blog or not, but rather it&#039;s about seeing each indvidual piece of content as its own business entity, competing against other like-kind content on the open and distributed web.

Put another way, the web is your website and search is your navigation.  Google doesn&#039;t direct traffic to your sites home page (only 20% of the time), but rather brings their customers to the precise peice of content about which they inquired.  More often than not the content lies somwhere dep within your site.

So, you see, the website integrated with blog is irrelevant.  Consumers doing research online and finding the content that satisifues each unique search request is much more relevant.

The battle for eyeballs will be fought on the open and distributed web.  Think distributed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google renders this discussion moot.  It&#8217;s not about the website, or whether it&#8217;s integrated with a blog or not, but rather it&#8217;s about seeing each indvidual piece of content as its own business entity, competing against other like-kind content on the open and distributed web.</p>
<p>Put another way, the web is your website and search is your navigation.  Google doesn&#8217;t direct traffic to your sites home page (only 20% of the time), but rather brings their customers to the precise peice of content about which they inquired.  More often than not the content lies somwhere dep within your site.</p>
<p>So, you see, the website integrated with blog is irrelevant.  Consumers doing research online and finding the content that satisifues each unique search request is much more relevant.</p>
<p>The battle for eyeballs will be fought on the open and distributed web.  Think distributed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel, The Real Estate Zebra</title>
		<link>http://www.notorious-rob.com/2009/02/17/the-one-site-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-965</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel, The Real Estate Zebra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notorious-rob.com/?p=696#comment-965</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you on this one, Notorious.  Heck, in our business, we&#039;ve been trying to get one site that incorporates both blog and &quot;traditional&quot; info developed for a while now.  We are finally going to get it launched by the end of the month, with the help of the great folks at The Real Estate Tomato.

In my estimation, having more than one site creates more issues than it solves.  First, there is the management side of things, double hosting, maintenance, etc.  That is a royal PITA.

From a marketing perspective, I think it can fracture your brand.  Multiple sites can lead to sending multiple messages.  I don&#039;t want to send multiple messages.  I want to send one message-- &quot;come HERE for everything you need.&quot;  I don&#039;t want to say, &quot;come here, and go there, and oh, go over there, too, because I own them all.&quot;

On of the main reasons that I think agents maintain two separate sites is there is a psychological comfort in it.  The agent thought process goes something like this-- &quot;Blogging is new, and trendy, and kinda edgy.  What if it doesn&#039;t work?  What if people hate it?  What if it doesn&#039;t generate any leads?  OMG, I can&#039;t give up my static site, it is trustworthy and safe.  It is my rock.&quot;

What most agents are missing is exactly what Kelley said-- a blog is merely a platform, a vehicle, a means by which you can do what you have always done, only better.

While the new StrongTeamRealtors.com is being built on the Wordpress platform, and blogging will be a component of what we do there, you will never hear us refer to it as a blog (not publicly, anyway).  Consumers don&#039;t care if the thing is Wordpress, or Point2, they don&#039;t care if it is a blog-based CMS or Joomla, they just want information, advice and expertise. Our job is to choose the most effective way to deliver it, all in one place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you on this one, Notorious.  Heck, in our business, we&#8217;ve been trying to get one site that incorporates both blog and &#8220;traditional&#8221; info developed for a while now.  We are finally going to get it launched by the end of the month, with the help of the great folks at The Real Estate Tomato.</p>
<p>In my estimation, having more than one site creates more issues than it solves.  First, there is the management side of things, double hosting, maintenance, etc.  That is a royal PITA.</p>
<p>From a marketing perspective, I think it can fracture your brand.  Multiple sites can lead to sending multiple messages.  I don&#8217;t want to send multiple messages.  I want to send one message&#8211; &#8220;come HERE for everything you need.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t want to say, &#8220;come here, and go there, and oh, go over there, too, because I own them all.&#8221;</p>
<p>On of the main reasons that I think agents maintain two separate sites is there is a psychological comfort in it.  The agent thought process goes something like this&#8211; &#8220;Blogging is new, and trendy, and kinda edgy.  What if it doesn&#8217;t work?  What if people hate it?  What if it doesn&#8217;t generate any leads?  OMG, I can&#8217;t give up my static site, it is trustworthy and safe.  It is my rock.&#8221;</p>
<p>What most agents are missing is exactly what Kelley said&#8211; a blog is merely a platform, a vehicle, a means by which you can do what you have always done, only better.</p>
<p>While the new StrongTeamRealtors.com is being built on the Wordpress platform, and blogging will be a component of what we do there, you will never hear us refer to it as a blog (not publicly, anyway).  Consumers don&#8217;t care if the thing is Wordpress, or Point2, they don&#8217;t care if it is a blog-based CMS or Joomla, they just want information, advice and expertise. Our job is to choose the most effective way to deliver it, all in one place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.notorious-rob.com/2009/02/17/the-one-site-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-967</link>
		<dc:creator>-Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notorious-rob.com/?p=696#comment-967</guid>
		<description>@Heather -

LOL, glad I could help. :)  Having people answer their own questions is ideal.

@Todd -

If having two sites with two URL&#039;s is beneficial for Kelley, then wouldn&#039;t it be better with three sites?  Why not four?  Fifteen?  As you say, with RSS and master CSS file, connecting 20 sites together into a seamless experience is no big deal.

@Jeff -

So the link to IDX, link to Relay, links to YouTube, etc. can&#039;t exist on your blog?  Why not?  Widgets from Trulia and such could go on a blog just as easily as they could go on a &#039;website&#039;.

But your site and your blog seem to serve totally different purposes, which then perhaps means they need to be separate.

-rsh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Heather -</p>
<p>LOL, glad I could help. <img src='http://www.notorious-rob.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Having people answer their own questions is ideal.</p>
<p>@Todd -</p>
<p>If having two sites with two URL&#8217;s is beneficial for Kelley, then wouldn&#8217;t it be better with three sites?  Why not four?  Fifteen?  As you say, with RSS and master CSS file, connecting 20 sites together into a seamless experience is no big deal.</p>
<p>@Jeff -</p>
<p>So the link to IDX, link to Relay, links to YouTube, etc. can&#8217;t exist on your blog?  Why not?  Widgets from Trulia and such could go on a blog just as easily as they could go on a &#8216;website&#8217;.</p>
<p>But your site and your blog seem to serve totally different purposes, which then perhaps means they need to be separate.</p>
<p>-rsh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FBS Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Wealth of Ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.notorious-rob.com/2009/02/17/the-one-site-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-966</link>
		<dc:creator>FBS Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Wealth of Ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notorious-rob.com/?p=696#comment-966</guid>
		<description>[...] The One Site to Rule Them All &#8212; Rob Hahn asks why agents have blogs separate from their listing search sites.  This caught my eye for two reasons: (1) today several blogging agents/brokers are promoting listing search in every blog post, whereas a year ago they thought the two should be separate; and (2) I&#8217;m personally working on re-framing the FBS Blog to include our support and sales sites. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The One Site to Rule Them All &#8212; Rob Hahn asks why agents have blogs separate from their listing search sites.  This caught my eye for two reasons: (1) today several blogging agents/brokers are promoting listing search in every blog post, whereas a year ago they thought the two should be separate; and (2) I&#8217;m personally working on re-framing the FBS Blog to include our support and sales sites. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Douglass</title>
		<link>http://www.notorious-rob.com/2009/02/17/the-one-site-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-964</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Douglass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notorious-rob.com/?p=696#comment-964</guid>
		<description>Dear RSH,  I saw your post on twitter earlier today but could not boil my thoughts down to 140 characters - with that said I really like your article which are always thought provoking.

While I started with just my primary website at www.jeffreydouglass.com which is produced on the Mac, I soon found that the blogging portion was not good enough for my needs and went to Word Press.  And yet I need the main website for more visual postings and more commercial aspects of my business.  In fact I think that most REALTORS are using a combination of many websites that are linked together for a seamless experience.  For instance I have a link IDX property searches, a link to Relay, which is a on-line transaction management with client access.  I also use links to single property websites, links to You Tube, and widgets for Trulia and other real estate related information.  I guess what I am trying to say is there is no universal tool to rule them all, YET anyway!  Nothing more sinister than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear RSH,  I saw your post on twitter earlier today but could not boil my thoughts down to 140 characters &#8211; with that said I really like your article which are always thought provoking.</p>
<p>While I started with just my primary website at <a href="http://www.jeffreydouglass.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.jeffreydouglass.com</a> which is produced on the Mac, I soon found that the blogging portion was not good enough for my needs and went to Word Press.  And yet I need the main website for more visual postings and more commercial aspects of my business.  In fact I think that most REALTORS are using a combination of many websites that are linked together for a seamless experience.  For instance I have a link IDX property searches, a link to Relay, which is a on-line transaction management with client access.  I also use links to single property websites, links to You Tube, and widgets for Trulia and other real estate related information.  I guess what I am trying to say is there is no universal tool to rule them all, YET anyway!  Nothing more sinister than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Carpenter</title>
		<link>http://www.notorious-rob.com/2009/02/17/the-one-site-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-962</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Carpenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notorious-rob.com/?p=696#comment-962</guid>
		<description>I think what Kelley would recommend and what she&#039;s been able to do on her own are unfortunately two different animals. Kelley&#039;s site was banned by Google. It&#039;s coming back now (gray hat SEO lessons learned)but she&#039;s had to operate from different URL&#039;s to grow organic web traffic in the mean time.

However, I like the idea of multiple sites. The way Kelley&#039;s sites are set up, people who come to the blog get the blog experience. People who come to housechick.com get the blog integrated, all-in-one experience. The magic of RSS and matching CSS takes care of connecting the two into a seamless experience between both sites.

Best of both worlds if you ask me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what Kelley would recommend and what she&#8217;s been able to do on her own are unfortunately two different animals. Kelley&#8217;s site was banned by Google. It&#8217;s coming back now (gray hat SEO lessons learned)but she&#8217;s had to operate from different URL&#8217;s to grow organic web traffic in the mean time.</p>
<p>However, I like the idea of multiple sites. The way Kelley&#8217;s sites are set up, people who come to the blog get the blog experience. People who come to housechick.com get the blog integrated, all-in-one experience. The magic of RSS and matching CSS takes care of connecting the two into a seamless experience between both sites.</p>
<p>Best of both worlds if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Elias</title>
		<link>http://www.notorious-rob.com/2009/02/17/the-one-site-to-rule-them-all/comment-page-1/#comment-963</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Elias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notorious-rob.com/?p=696#comment-963</guid>
		<description>Ah. Love it. Currently have been engaging in an intense internal debate over whether I should meld the two sites to one..and how it will affect the overall impression for the consumer...there aren&#039;t two distinct types of consumer out there, which I can appeal to with two divergent types of websites (blog and &#039;all business&#039;.) I think in large part having the two continues to pursue the &#039;shotgun&#039; theory of pelleting a wider area with shallow ammo rather than focusing with one site most intensely on where my strengths are.

Wait, I think I just answered my own question. Thanks, Rob!
;)

~Heather</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah. Love it. Currently have been engaging in an intense internal debate over whether I should meld the two sites to one..and how it will affect the overall impression for the consumer&#8230;there aren&#8217;t two distinct types of consumer out there, which I can appeal to with two divergent types of websites (blog and &#8216;all business&#8217;.) I think in large part having the two continues to pursue the &#8217;shotgun&#8217; theory of pelleting a wider area with shallow ammo rather than focusing with one site most intensely on where my strengths are.</p>
<p>Wait, I think I just answered my own question. Thanks, Rob! <img src='http://www.notorious-rob.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>~Heather</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
