Comments on: Time to Call My Stockbroker: Buy MOVE! http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/11/26/time-to-call-my-stockbroker-buy-move/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss Conversations about the real estate industry, marketing, technology, and public policy Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:48:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: -Rob http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/11/26/time-to-call-my-stockbroker-buy-move/#comment-649 -Rob Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:02:42 +0000 http://robhahn.wordpress.com/?p=455#comment-649 @notsofar - True... of course, the reason why their current assets are the way it looks is unrelated to their core operations, and rather has more to do with auction-rate securities.... So you can decide whether that's strength or weakness. :) -rsh @notsofar -

True… of course, the reason why their current assets are the way it looks is unrelated to their core operations, and rather has more to do with auction-rate securities….

So you can decide whether that’s strength or weakness. :)

-rsh

]]> By: -Rob http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/11/26/time-to-call-my-stockbroker-buy-move/#comment-3906 -Rob Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:02:00 +0000 http://robhahn.wordpress.com/?p=455#comment-3906 @notsofar - True... of course, the reason why their current assets are the way it looks is unrelated to their core operations, and rather has more to do with auction-rate securities.... So you can decide whether that's strength or weakness. :) -rsh @notsofar -

True… of course, the reason why their current assets are the way it looks is unrelated to their core operations, and rather has more to do with auction-rate securities….

So you can decide whether that’s strength or weakness. :)

-rsh

]]> By: -Rob http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/11/26/time-to-call-my-stockbroker-buy-move/#comment-3907 -Rob Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:02:00 +0000 http://robhahn.wordpress.com/?p=455#comment-3907 @notsofar - True... of course, the reason why their current assets are the way it looks is unrelated to their core operations, and rather has more to do with auction-rate securities.... So you can decide whether that's strength or weakness. :) -rsh @notsofar -

True… of course, the reason why their current assets are the way it looks is unrelated to their core operations, and rather has more to do with auction-rate securities….

So you can decide whether that’s strength or weakness. :)

-rsh

]]> By: not so far http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/11/26/time-to-call-my-stockbroker-buy-move/#comment-648 not so far Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:40:05 +0000 http://robhahn.wordpress.com/?p=455#comment-648 Throughout your whole post the word DEBT only appeared once. I could have $100B in cash, but if I have a $100B in debt, that means nothing. MOVE has a current ratio of 1.09, which suggest that they aren't as strong as you think they are. They only have $12M more in their current assets line item than their current liability line item. Throughout your whole post the word DEBT only appeared once. I could have $100B in cash, but if I have a $100B in debt, that means nothing.

MOVE has a current ratio of 1.09, which suggest that they aren’t as strong as you think they are. They only have $12M more in their current assets line item than their current liability line item.

]]> By: not so far http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/11/26/time-to-call-my-stockbroker-buy-move/#comment-3904 not so far Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:40:00 +0000 http://robhahn.wordpress.com/?p=455#comment-3904 Throughout your whole post the word DEBT only appeared once. I could have $100B in cash, but if I have a $100B in debt, that means nothing. MOVE has a current ratio of 1.09, which suggest that they aren't as strong as you think they are. They only have $12M more in their current assets line item than their current liability line item. Throughout your whole post the word DEBT only appeared once. I could have $100B in cash, but if I have a $100B in debt, that means nothing.

MOVE has a current ratio of 1.09, which suggest that they aren’t as strong as you think they are. They only have $12M more in their current assets line item than their current liability line item.

]]> By: not so far http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/11/26/time-to-call-my-stockbroker-buy-move/#comment-3905 not so far Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:40:00 +0000 http://robhahn.wordpress.com/?p=455#comment-3905 Throughout your whole post the word DEBT only appeared once. I could have $100B in cash, but if I have a $100B in debt, that means nothing. MOVE has a current ratio of 1.09, which suggest that they aren't as strong as you think they are. They only have $12M more in their current assets line item than their current liability line item. Throughout your whole post the word DEBT only appeared once. I could have $100B in cash, but if I have a $100B in debt, that means nothing.

MOVE has a current ratio of 1.09, which suggest that they aren’t as strong as you think they are. They only have $12M more in their current assets line item than their current liability line item.

]]> By: -Rob http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/11/26/time-to-call-my-stockbroker-buy-move/#comment-646 -Rob Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:25:06 +0000 http://robhahn.wordpress.com/?p=455#comment-646 I was frankly surprised at how low Move seemed to value that agreement. $1.5m? Really? I would think the hordes of second-gen listings search engines would gladly pay NAR more than that.... -rsh I was frankly surprised at how low Move seemed to value that agreement. $1.5m? Really? I would think the hordes of second-gen listings search engines would gladly pay NAR more than that….

-rsh

]]> By: -Rob http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/11/26/time-to-call-my-stockbroker-buy-move/#comment-3901 -Rob Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:25:00 +0000 http://robhahn.wordpress.com/?p=455#comment-3901 I was frankly surprised at how low Move seemed to value that agreement. $1.5m? Really? I would think the hordes of second-gen listings search engines would gladly pay NAR more than that.... -rsh I was frankly surprised at how low Move seemed to value that agreement. $1.5m? Really? I would think the hordes of second-gen listings search engines would gladly pay NAR more than that….

-rsh

]]> By: -Rob http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/11/26/time-to-call-my-stockbroker-buy-move/#comment-3902 -Rob Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:25:00 +0000 http://robhahn.wordpress.com/?p=455#comment-3902 I was frankly surprised at how low Move seemed to value that agreement. $1.5m? Really? I would think the hordes of second-gen listings search engines would gladly pay NAR more than that.... -rsh I was frankly surprised at how low Move seemed to value that agreement. $1.5m? Really? I would think the hordes of second-gen listings search engines would gladly pay NAR more than that….

-rsh

]]> By: Louis Cammarosano http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/11/26/time-to-call-my-stockbroker-buy-move/#comment-647 Louis Cammarosano Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:51:40 +0000 http://robhahn.wordpress.com/?p=455#comment-647 Rob I would agree that Move is undervalued given the assets that they have. There is one major hinderance to a takeover -its the life time agreement between NAR and Move. Rob
I would agree that Move is undervalued given the assets that they have.
There is one major hinderance to a takeover -its the life time agreement between NAR and Move.

]]>