<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking Backward vs. Springing Forward: NAR, Move and Realtor.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/08/01/looking-backward-vs-springing-forward-nar-move-and-realtorcom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/08/01/looking-backward-vs-springing-forward-nar-move-and-realtorcom/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rss</link>
	<description>Conversations about the real estate industry, marketing, technology, and public policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:48:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crystal L. Cox</title>
		<link>http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/08/01/looking-backward-vs-springing-forward-nar-move-and-realtorcom/#comment-1319</link>
		<dc:creator>Crystal L. Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 03:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robhahn.wordpress.com/?p=211#comment-1319</guid>
		<description>the National Association of Realtors is Out for Themselves, there is no consumer protection in real estate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the National Association of Realtors is Out for Themselves, there is no consumer protection in real estate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crystal L. Cox</title>
		<link>http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/08/01/looking-backward-vs-springing-forward-nar-move-and-realtorcom/#comment-3623</link>
		<dc:creator>Crystal L. Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 03:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robhahn.wordpress.com/?p=211#comment-3623</guid>
		<description>the National Association of Realtors is Out for Themselves, there is no consumer protection in real estate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the National Association of Realtors is Out for Themselves, there is no consumer protection in real estate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/08/01/looking-backward-vs-springing-forward-nar-move-and-realtorcom/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>-Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robhahn.wordpress.com/?p=211#comment-347</guid>
		<description>@George -

&lt;blockquote&gt;Do you know if anyone has challenged the legality of the mandatory contribution to the NAR political slush fund, called a special assessment for a so called public awareness campaign?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I do not know... but I doubt that can be challenged... NAR isn&#039;t a mandatory union, after all, and few if any brokerages are &quot;closed union shops&quot;.

-rsh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@George -</p>
<blockquote><p>Do you know if anyone has challenged the legality of the mandatory contribution to the NAR political slush fund, called a special assessment for a so called public awareness campaign?</p></blockquote>
<p>I do not know&#8230; but I doubt that can be challenged&#8230; NAR isn&#8217;t a mandatory union, after all, and few if any brokerages are &#8220;closed union shops&#8221;.</p>
<p>-rsh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/08/01/looking-backward-vs-springing-forward-nar-move-and-realtorcom/#comment-3622</link>
		<dc:creator>-Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robhahn.wordpress.com/?p=211#comment-3622</guid>
		<description>@George -

&lt;blockquote&gt;Do you know if anyone has challenged the legality of the mandatory contribution to the NAR political slush fund, called a special assessment for a so called public awareness campaign?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I do not know... but I doubt that can be challenged... NAR isn&#039;t a mandatory union, after all, and few if any brokerages are &quot;closed union shops&quot;.

-rsh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@George -</p>
<blockquote><p>Do you know if anyone has challenged the legality of the mandatory contribution to the NAR political slush fund, called a special assessment for a so called public awareness campaign?</p></blockquote>
<p>I do not know&#8230; but I doubt that can be challenged&#8230; NAR isn&#8217;t a mandatory union, after all, and few if any brokerages are &#8220;closed union shops&#8221;.</p>
<p>-rsh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/08/01/looking-backward-vs-springing-forward-nar-move-and-realtorcom/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>George Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robhahn.wordpress.com/?p=211#comment-346</guid>
		<description>Do you know if anyone has challenged the legality of the mandatory contribution to the NAR political slush fund, called a special assessment for a so called public awareness campaign?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know if anyone has challenged the legality of the mandatory contribution to the NAR political slush fund, called a special assessment for a so called public awareness campaign?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/08/01/looking-backward-vs-springing-forward-nar-move-and-realtorcom/#comment-3621</link>
		<dc:creator>George Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robhahn.wordpress.com/?p=211#comment-3621</guid>
		<description>Do you know if anyone has challenged the legality of the mandatory contribution to the NAR political slush fund, called a special assessment for a so called public awareness campaign?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know if anyone has challenged the legality of the mandatory contribution to the NAR political slush fund, called a special assessment for a so called public awareness campaign?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/08/01/looking-backward-vs-springing-forward-nar-move-and-realtorcom/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 05:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robhahn.wordpress.com/?p=211#comment-345</guid>
		<description>A special assessment?

No thanks. It wouldn&#039;t be that hard for NAR to run Realtor.com, and if they did, NAR would have agents willing to spring for Realtor.com once again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A special assessment?</p>
<p>No thanks. It wouldn&#8217;t be that hard for NAR to run Realtor.com, and if they did, NAR would have agents willing to spring for Realtor.com once again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/08/01/looking-backward-vs-springing-forward-nar-move-and-realtorcom/#comment-3620</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 05:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robhahn.wordpress.com/?p=211#comment-3620</guid>
		<description>A special assessment?

No thanks. It wouldn&#039;t be that hard for NAR to run Realtor.com, and if they did, NAR would have agents willing to spring for Realtor.com once again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A special assessment?</p>
<p>No thanks. It wouldn&#8217;t be that hard for NAR to run Realtor.com, and if they did, NAR would have agents willing to spring for Realtor.com once again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hate REALTOR.com for Only the Right Reasons &#124; Real Estate Magazine - Real Estate Opinion Column - AgentGenius</title>
		<link>http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/08/01/looking-backward-vs-springing-forward-nar-move-and-realtorcom/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>Hate REALTOR.com for Only the Right Reasons &#124; Real Estate Magazine - Real Estate Opinion Column - AgentGenius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 04:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robhahn.wordpress.com/?p=211#comment-344</guid>
		<description>[...] The Notorious R.O. B., here is a very interesting idea of how NAR could take Realtor.com back.&#160; Totally worth reading.&#160; Here is the NAR takes back Realtor.com links page.&#160; Please [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Notorious R.O. B., here is a very interesting idea of how NAR could take Realtor.com back.&nbsp; Totally worth reading.&nbsp; Here is the NAR takes back Realtor.com links page.&nbsp; Please [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.notorious-rob.com/2008/08/01/looking-backward-vs-springing-forward-nar-move-and-realtorcom/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 19:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robhahn.wordpress.com/?p=211#comment-343</guid>
		<description>A NAR angel fund sounds like a fantastic idea, it would help to catalyze some much needed in the innovation in the technically challenged and pained real estate industry, and those champions could be used to further push the efficiency of the industry.

How possible is that? Not very but it would be a great move in NAR could get over the bureaucracy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A NAR angel fund sounds like a fantastic idea, it would help to catalyze some much needed in the innovation in the technically challenged and pained real estate industry, and those champions could be used to further push the efficiency of the industry.</p>
<p>How possible is that? Not very but it would be a great move in NAR could get over the bureaucracy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

